Case study · Construction arbitration · High-rise construction dispute

Every witness statement tested against the whole record.

2,000+ potential inconsistencies flagged across more than 10 witness statements, each tied to the contradicting page.

MatterHigh-rise construction dispute

ForumConstruction arbitration

100,000+pages of record

10+witness statements checked

2,000+flags for counsel

Citedeach flag tied to its document and page

How it was built

01
The delivery
Each statement checked against the record, with over 2,000 potential inconsistencies flagged for counsel, each tied to the contradicting document and page, and a timeline of the project the delay analysis ran on.
02
The trace
Every flag opens the paragraph and the contradicting document; every event opens its source page.

DashboardWS-07 against the record

Witness statement WS-073 contradictions

Site manager for the Contractor

¶ 17We started mobilising for piling in early February.

¶ 18No one told us Area B was free. The fence was still there in March.

¶ 19Our crews stood idle for 23 days.

WS-07 · p. 6

Email · 14 Feb 2021

“The area has been available to you since 11 February.”

Contradicts ¶ 18R-0102 · ¶ 2

Inspection report · 11 Feb 2021

“Fence moved to the eastern boundary. Free for piling from today.”